[ILUG-BOM] Re: Ur view is right - But not entirely right and other OT

[jtdyahoo]

On Wednesday 18 July 2001 19:57, Tushar Burman wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>

> But wait... I need to pay the phone bill, the rent, the
> electricity, the LSD/Ecstasy etc.

> So I sell it. I'm sure I'd need some sort of license to release
> it. Realistically, it simply MUST have some restrictions on what
> the user can do with it. If he's able to legally just give it to
> another friend, I don't make money. 

You have the wrong business model. You are trying to sell a product 
to as many people as possible while simultaneously trying to 
prevent them from using it as they deem fit (which includes 
copying). 
One can assemble a motorbike with spares from the market - duly 
modified to kickass. There is a niche market for this. But if it 
does not kickass (or i prevent others from further customising) no 
body will buy it. Those who do not need the high performance will 
buy a standard model from abc & co. Why? cause it is cheaper than 
the one i assemble using spares - not because of fancy laws. All 
arguments regarding costs / economics put up by the software cos 
are a lot of hot air. In fact the automobile industry faces a whole 
lot of laws protecting the consumer and spends far more on their 
products. This is the exact opposite of the software industry. 
The same goes for any industry. You can buy a pc from an assembler 
or IBM. Would a law preventing people from buying any machine other 
than IBM be justified.
A business built on artificially erected barriers designed to 
protect the minority is doomed to failure.
As expertise grows in society premium goods aquire a commodity 
characteristics. Businesses then need customers to uniquely 
identify their products from those of competitors - BRANDING and 
the accompanying marketing baggage. Laws that prevent growth of and 
disbursement of knowledge within society so that only a few may 
benefit has no place in any society.

> Not too many people would be willing to
> make those sacrifices and even if they are willing, might not be
> in a position to do so.

One need not be a hermit. But one need not be unprincipled either. 
Make your own value system and live by that.

Duplicating currency is another interesting industry having 
properties similiar to software and monopolised by the government. 
A responsible government does not need to print (create) and 
publish currency (software) as it can meet it's needs by 
judiciously utilising resources that enables users to create value. 
(called economic growth) Governments less responsible will tax 
(charge) arbitarily & print and publish when ever they need money, 
effectively diluting the worth of it's users. Govts do this under 
the guise of providing you great new services (.net) amongst other 
lofty ideals. In India and other countries with less responsible 
govt. we would be justified in duplicating money (in an attempt  to 
reflect it's actual worth) but prevented by law which protects the 
government monopoly. So how do you protect the value of your money? 
By converting into a more stable and valuable currency say $ 
(GNU-Linux). But this is illegal. Why? as the people migrate to $ 
the Rs. will become more worthless and the $ more valuable. Who 
looses? The irresponsible government ofcourse. So govt. builds 
legal barriers and use the FERA (copyright) to nail the smart ones 
and call them smugglers, antinationals etc (viral, antiamerican 
etc.) and spreads FUD to con the ignorant. If the money is 
worthless nobody will use it, even the government. The government 
will now borrow $ (free BSD?) and sell it to you in Rs at a fat 
premium. At the same time they prevent you from borrowing  
(preventing OEMs from loading another OS) or converting (using your 
doc and xls files). The end result crashes, instability, suffering. 
Why? because of laws preventing freeflow of (intellectual) capital 
and equal rights. 

The GPL tries to prevent the above state of affairs by allowing you 
the option of walking in the direction you please. You can migrate 
to any software. You can preserve the value of your work without 
paying fat premiums. You have access to the same resources as the 
fatcats. It prevents the fatcats from putting up barriers for 
others.

-- 
jtdesouza at yahoo.com

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com