[Fsf-india] DEBATE: Why Linux... why GNU/Linux
Raju Mathur
raju@linux-delhi.org
Mon, 18 Mar 2002 19:00:02 +0530 (IST)
>>>>> "RM" == Ramakrishnan M <gnuhead@myrealbox.com> writes:
RM> Raju Mathur wrote:
>> Sad to see that so many members of the FSF-I community believe
>> that attacking a person is the right way to spread their
>> message of freedom and openness.
RM> I don't believe in personal attack without a reason either.
Of course, since you decide the reason, it automatically follows that
if you attack someone you have ample reason for doing so.
Self-referential and completely meaningless.
>> the world doesn't really give a d*mn. I believe what I believe
>> and do what I do, and your trivial categorisations are of the
>> least
RM> It will do a lot of good for mankind if everyone understand
RM> what they talk and also understand that most of the
RM> individuals in the world think alike and have "similar"
RM> beliefs.
No, /you/ believe that you know what's good for mankind and generalise
it for the remaining 5,999,999,999 people on the planet. I'll agree
with you if you say, `I believe that this is good for mankind, but I'm
willing and open to listening to and tolerating other beliefs.' I
haven't heard an iota of tolerance on this list yet, and a community
without tolerance is dubbed Fascist.
>> call what software and (b) making personal attacks on people.
>> Maybe that's one way of awakening people, but don't mind if I
>> stick to my own way which tends to prefer doing over talking.
RM> I believe we should balance both, that's what the free
RM> software community had been doing, otherwise we would have
RM> never seen GNU or linux kernel.
Free software community defined as `people who do and not talk'.
Regards,
-- Raju
--
Raju Mathur raju@kandalaya.org http://kandalaya.org/
It is the mind that moves