[FSF India] RH, SuSE etc
Mohit Agarwal
mohit@tugindia.org.in
Sat, 10 Nov 2001 19:47:14 +0530
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 07:15:22PM +0530, Raju Mathur wrote:
> >>>>> "Khuzaima" == Khuzaima A Lakdawala <klak@giasbm01.vsnl.net.in> writes:
>
> Khuzaima> [snip]
>
> Khuzaima> Why are some GNU/Linux distributions considered
> Khuzaima> "unethical" by some? Well, because they add non-free,
> Khuzaima> proprietary applications in the garb of "value
> Khuzaima> addition". Basically, these are businesses which are
> Khuzaima> trying to get a free ride on the "Linux bandwagon" and
> Khuzaima> don't really have anything to do with the ideals of Free
> Khuzaima> Software.
>
> You may be right for some distributions, but that's not strictly
> correct. Red Hat and SuSE, for example, produce large amounts of free
> source code while adding non-free proprietary applications to their
> distributions. Sweeping generalisations (``Debian is good, everybody
> else is a thief'' variety) tend to make their containing arguments
> lose whatever merit they may have had.
Absolutely correct. It's just like making statements without being
aware and, moreover, exhibiting unwillingness to find out, learn,
listen or reason.
Take a look at http://sources.redhat.com/ [*] and you'll find who
maintains (or helps in a big way to maintain) projects like glibc,
gcc, gdb just to name a few.
[*] It's a grossly `unethical' site and your browsers and even
operating systems might crash before loading the page. Beware!
--
mohit