On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:40 AM, CK Raju <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ck.thrissur@gmail.com">ck.thrissur@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">A draft should be prepared with relevant clauses. Any sane free<br>
software movement should be expected to comply with it. It should be<br>
possible for Governments and other organizations to comply with it.<br>
</blockquote></div></div></blockquote><br>It would have been more prudent to suggest our activists friends to place similar demands on respective political establishments to come out with such a stand - where they disclose their manifesto too - so that funding corporates are also not fooled.<br>
<br>Sane or insane free software groups have a limitation upto where they could go - especially when many of them are still in their initial learning phase - mistakes are not uncommon - and they are fast learners too. But that's not the case with political establishments.<br>
<br>CK Raju<br></div><br>