[Fsf-friends] Fsf-friends Digest, Vol 13, Issue 15

Anoop Krishnan G anoopkrishnang at yahoo.in
Thu Oct 30 14:32:15 IST 2008


This must be a topic of Discussion as the world is moving so fast than v think



________________________________
From: "fsf-friends-request at mm.gnu.org.in" <fsf-friends-request at mm.gnu.org.in>
To: fsf-friends at mm.gnu.org.in
Sent: Tuesday, 28 October, 2008 11:30:01 PM
Subject: Fsf-friends Digest, Vol 13, Issue 15

Send Fsf-friends mailing list submissions to
    fsf-friends at mm.gnu.org.in

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    http://mm.gnu.org.in/mailman/listinfo/fsf-friends
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    fsf-friends-request at mm.gnu.org.in

You can reach the person managing the list at
    fsf-friends-owner at mm.gnu.org.in

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Fsf-friends digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: LINUX II (Linux Kernel having Microkernel    Architecture)
      (Raj Mathur)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:51:36 +0530
From: Raj Mathur <raju at linux-delhi.org>
Subject: Re: [Fsf-friends] LINUX II (Linux Kernel having Microkernel
    Architecture)
To: fsf-friends at mm.gnu.org.in
Message-ID: <200810291051.36189.raju at linux-delhi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"

On Wednesday 29 Oct 2008, Anoop Krishnan G wrote:
> Now its time for another revolution inside LINUX ..... lets call it
> LINUX-II ..... The monolithic architecture had become age old now its
> need a change , we can start this change before the COPYRIGHT people
> starts this revolution , the COPYRIGHT people had already set for it

Umm, Linux and all GNU programs are already copyrighted!

> .... so lets begin this revolution ...... "A LINUX WITH MICROKERNEL
> ARCHITECTURE" .............. lets celebrate freedom in a new domain of

Isn't that what Hurd is supposed to achieve?  Anyway, there are 
arguments both for and against the microkernel architecture, so why 
don't we first debate whether that architecture is actually a major 
step forward or not?

In the immortal words of some anonymous genius: If it ain't broke don't 
fix it :)

Regards,

-- Raju
-- 
Raj Mathur                raju at kandalaya.org      http://kandalaya.org/
       GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5  0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F
PsyTrance & Chill: http://schizoid.in/   ||   It is the mind that moves


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Fsf-friends mailing list
Fsf-friends at mm.gnu.org.in
http://mm.gnu.org.in/mailman/listinfo/fsf-friends


End of Fsf-friends Digest, Vol 13, Issue 15
*******************************************



      Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.gnu.org.in/pipermail/fsf-friends/attachments/20081030/ffb7dd43/attachment.htm 


More information about the Fsf-friends mailing list