[Fsf-friends] INDIA: Computer programme patenting may brake IT boom

[Frederick Noronha (FN)]

http://infotech.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1023943.cms

Computer programme patenting may brake IT boom

TIMES NEWS NETWORK[ THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 2005 06:17:58 PM]
NEW DELHI: Imagine a scenario where a music composer is prevented from 
being inspired by another musician. He has to start from scratch and give 
an entirely new definition to music. Unimaginable, isn't it? Now replace 
'music' with 'software' and this is what the Indian government is seeking 
to do. Or so some critics argue.

The amendments to the Indian Patent Act introduced by a recent Ordinance 
will allow all computer programmes to be patented. The Indian Patent Act, 
as modified in 2002, had made "a mathematical method or a business method 
or a computer programme per se or algorithms" non-patentable.

However, the recent amendment changes this phrase defining what cannot be 
patented to "a computer programme per se other than its technical 
application to industry or a combination with hardware, a mathematical or 
business method or algorithms."

Since any commercial software has some industry application and these 
applications are technical in nature, it opens virtually all software to 
patenting, say the critics of the move.

  As a booming software nation, can India afford to take such a step 
without harming interests of the industry? These were concerns expressed 
at a press conference organised by the Delhi Science Forum on Tuesday.

The US and Japan, they said, are two countries that have provided for 
patent protection in software, which has adversely impacted smaller 
developers. European Parliament has been forced to defer software 
patenting in the wake of widespread opposition to such a move.

  A patent in the case of software grants monopoly control over not just 
the 'expression' of a function or idea in computer code, which could be 
covered by copyright, but over the very idea itself.

Thus, software would be covered by both copyright and patents, perhaps the 
only instance of a product being underpinned by both. Richard Stallman, 
co-developer of the GNU-Linux operating system and proponent of free 
software says, "Since software patents cover software ideas, it makes them 
a dangerous obstacle to all software development."

An example is Amazon's singleclick agreement. Amazon.com was granted a 
patent on a system that remembers customer credit card data from visit to 
visit, so that customers could, on all visits after their first, simply 
order products and then click once to buy them using a stored credit card 
number.

After two rounds of litigation, this patent was upheld and Amazon was able 
to prevent its chief competitor, barnesandnoble.com, from using a similar 
system.

The main argument against software patenting is that it will kill 
innovations, by leaving small firms or software developers liable for 
patent infringements. "That's like saying, be the greatest genius in 
history or don't even try", said Stallman.

Small developers will always be fighting with their backs to the wall as 
they would not have the financial muscle to compete with dominant players 
in the market.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Frederick Noronha (FN)                    Nr Convent Saligao 403511 GoaIndia
Freelance Journalist                      P: 832-2409490 M: 9822122436
http://fn.swiki.net                       http://fn-floss.notlong.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Where the needs of the world and your talents cross, there lies your
vocation. --Aristotle