[Fsf-friends] Fwd: [linuxlingam@bhairon.com: [LIG] [draft] open letter to indian finance minister]
Nagarjuna G.
nagarjun@hbcse.tifr.res.in
Sat, 8 Mar 2003 08:44:24 +0530
----- Forwarded message from LinuxLingam <linuxlingam@bhairon.com> -----
> Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:52:28 +0530
> From: LinuxLingam <linuxlingam@bhairon.com>
> Subject: [LIG] [draft] open letter to indian finance minister
> To: ilugd@wpaa.org, linux-india-general@lists.sourceforge.net, rms@gnu.org,
> fred@bytesforall.org, karunakar@freedomink.org, rahul@electronicsforu.com
> Reply-To: linux-india-general@lists.sourceforge.net
> X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1]
>
> [first draft: please submit your suggestions, changes. once a final draft is
> ready, will post it so those interested may sign or contribute their name to
> it. will then forward this to the indian finance minister and others in the
> government.]
>
> [cross-posted,
> and further cross-post, especially to other mailing lists, if required]
>
> ***
>
> Dear Sir,
>
> Re: Levy Excise Tax on All Commercial Software Sold in India.
>
>
> We, the undersigned, propose the Indian Government levy excise tax on all
> commercial software sold in India. Reasons:
>
> 1) Commercial software (C.S) is a big cash drain for both the Indian
> government and Indian corporates.
>
> 2) Almost all commercial software are non-free. This means, they do not give
> the end users the freedom i) to use the software for any purpose ii) to study
> the source code of the software iii) to make changes and improvements to the
> source code iv) to legally share copies of the software with their neighbours
> and colleagues. v) to pass on such freedom to those who further receive the
> software.
>
> 3) these freedoms are important for a developing, poor, country like India,
> where every citizen, organization, and state, dreams of harnessing the
> opportunities offered by IT.
>
> 4) these freedoms also significantly curtail strong anti-competitive
> behaviour in the software industry.
>
> 5) countries like China are moving away from non-free software to
> freedom-based software. India has no such significant, clearly-defined
> initiative in place for adopting freedom based software.
>
> 6) in the lack of such a clear initiative, commercial software vendors raise
> the stakes for both their competitors and for freedom based software. this
> further kills innovation in the industry.
>
> 7) a large and significant percentage of commercial software is usually sold
> as bundled, OEM software. end-users find they are *forced* to use such
> software, since their requests to buy machines with such software uninstalled
> is usually turned down.
>
> 8) indian customers usually find their *only* option is to buy the computer
> with the bundled software, then carefully disagree the end user license
> agreement (eula) of the bundled software preferably in front of witnesses,
> then contact the OEM software vendor independently and press for a refund.
> this is clearly anti-competitive. and the computer is perceived in cost as
> (hardware+OEM software as One).
>
> 9) Commercial software companies are usually quite rich. Not taxing them
> allows them to hoard their wealth even more and give them more implicit power
> to quash their competition in commercial software and in freedom-based
> software.
>
> 10) by taxing them, the indian government will immediately have more powers
> to i) accelerate the adoption of freedom based software.
> ii) fund the development of much-needed indigenous solutions in IT for india
> using freedom-based software (indian language technologies, education
> projects, free and freedom-based education software, more secure and
> transparant software for indian defense industries, lower IT infrastructure
> costs for indian government and businesses, etc.)
>
> 11) by taxing commercial software and funding several projects in india on
> freedom-based software, the indian government also creates a quantum leap in
> the number of jobs and opportunities available to the indian developer
> community and IT industry, thus creating and sharing more wealth.
>
> 12) the adoption of free and freedom-based software allows indian corporates
> to save considerable sums of money towards commercial non-free software,
> where the Return on Investment is loudly questioned. this money can then be
> used for further job-creating opportunities such as expansion of new units of
> industrial manufacturing, factories, etc. shareholders of indian companies
> will also benefit from stronger dividends due to stronger profit margins due
> to the adoption of free and freedom-based software.
>
> 13) the already financially-starved education sector in India will gain,
> since the large allocation of funds for software in education can be used
> more productively, even for opening more schools instead.
>
> 14) finally, as a statement of leadership and values, india must adopt
> freedom-based software that is being proposed to the UNICEF to be declared as
> a world-culture heritage.
>
> We hope the Indian government sincerely considers these suggestions. For more
> information on what is freedom-based software, please check out www.gnu.org.
>
> Bizarre as it sounds, when it comes to software:
> Give us Freedom, or Give Us Taxes.
>
>
> Your Sincerely,
>
> <signatures...>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger
> for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and
> disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX
> and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-india-general mailing list
> Linux-india-general@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-general
----- End forwarded message -----
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
nagarjun@hbcse.tifr.res.in www.hbcse.tifr.res.in/gn/
Key fingerprint = C1E2 1B8C 8E98 A697 68B7 ADAC E956 6D4B DE90 BF01