[Fsf-friends] Microsoft will offer Linux software, predicts META

Tue, 10 Dec 2002 23:22:59 -0800

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--Boundary_(ID_ow6JYy2Vaxb+/XmkrCPW3A)
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="Boundary_(ID_J+x5+DEDxR/uWecXIVaFag)"

--Boundary_(ID_J+x5+DEDxR/uWecXIVaFag)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

Microsoft will offer Linux software, predicts META

REUTERS[ TUESDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2002 10:01:45 AM ] 
SEATTLE: In a major strategy shift, Microsoft will introduce software based on the Linux open source operating system in 2004 for Web services and server software, market researcher META Group predicted on Monday.

Microsoft, which denied that it had any plans to develop software for Linux, is facing a growing threat from the open source software standard as it gains share in the corporate server market used to manage networks and data.

META Group predicted that Linux will be used on nearly half of new servers by 2007, up from its current share of 15 to 20 per cent, making it difficult for Microsoft to ignore Linux as a platform for its database, Web hosting and e-mail server applications.

"We believe that, beginning in late 2004, Microsoft (and its partners) will begin moving some of its (to-date) proprietary application enablers (eg, .Net components) to the Linux environment; this will gradually include the major Microsoft back-office products, such as SQL Server, IIS, and Exchange," META Group said.

In a further shift, META Group said that Microsoft will also re-price or separate its Windows server operating system "so that it can be favourably compared against 'free' Linux."

"I'm unaware of any efforts at this time to move any products onto Linux," said Peter Houston, senior director at Microsoft's server group, adding that there were no plans to detach or re-price its Windows server operating system.

"We have made a bet on Windows, and we believe that customers are getting value from the bet we made," said Houston, "and we're going to continue doing what we've been doing for customers."

Linux advocates argue that Linux offers better security, flexibility and innovation because its underlying code, or blueprint, for programs remains open to evaluation and scrutiny.

Microsoft, which has grown into the world's largest software maker by selling proprietary software that cannot be copied or modified freely, said it is not opposed to open-source software, and points out that its source code is available to approved partners and educational institutions on a limited basis.

Cost A Non-Issue

Microsoft faced a similar situation a decade ago when its nascent server software was competing head-to-head with market leader Sun Microsystems, but Microsoft did not choose at the time to write software for Sun's proprietary version of Unix.

Now Linux, essentially a free version of Unix, is eating away at Sun's share of the business server market.

Sun, a hardware and software maker, is now selling computers running Linux, a strategy that was also embraced by International Business Machines. 

Redmond, Washington-based Microsoft has toned down its criticism of Linux recently, after an internal strategy document said that some of its arguments against open source software has "backfired."

Instead, Microsoft has stressed that its software is more affordable when considering the total cost of using Linux, including ongoing personnel and administration costs.

A recent Microsoft-sponsored study by researcher IDC concluded that servers based on Microsoft's Windows 2000 were cheaper to own and operate when used for networking, storing and sharing files, printing and security, while Linux servers were cheaper to operate when used for Web hosting.

"The IDC study shows that the upfront cost is a small part of the total cost to the customer," said Microsoft's Houston.

META Group's report also came to the same conclusion, saying that Linux's total costs of ownership were likely to be higher for mainstream server applications.

"IT organisations must evaluate platform costs from a total-cost-of-ownership perspective," META Group's report said.

Source: "Economic Times" dt 10th Dec '02

=================================================================

N.S. Soundara Rajan, freelance IT journalist and Knowledge networker, based at Mysore, India
 ...connecting people to people, and people to knowledge

--Boundary_(ID_J+x5+DEDxR/uWecXIVaFag)
Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4134.600" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>Microsoft 
will offer Linux software, predicts META <IMG height=5 
src="http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/images/spacer.gif" 
width=370> REUTERS<IMG height=1 
src="http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/images/spacer.gif" 
width=2>[ TUESDAY, 
DECEMBER 10, 2002 10:01:45 AM ] 
<DIV align=justify>
<DIV class=Section1>
SEATTLE: In a major strategy shift, Microsoft will introduce 
software based on the Linux open source operating system in 2004 for Web 
services and server software, market researcher META Group predicted on 
Monday.
Microsoft, which denied that it 
had any plans to develop software for Linux, is facing a growing threat from the 
open source software standard as it gains share in the corporate server market 
used to manage networks and data.
META Group predicted that Linux 
will be used on nearly half of new servers by 2007, up from its current share of 
15 to 20 per cent, making it difficult for Microsoft to ignore Linux as a 
platform for its database, Web hosting and e-mail server 
applications.
"We believe that, beginning in 
late 2004, Microsoft (and its partners) will begin moving some of its (to-date) 
proprietary application enablers (eg, .Net components) to the Linux environment; 
this will gradually include the major Microsoft back-office products, such as 
SQL Server, IIS, and Exchange," META Group said.
In a further shift, META Group 
said that Microsoft will also re-price or separate its Windows server operating 
system "so that it can be favourably compared against 'free' Linux."
"I'm unaware of any efforts at 
this time to move any products onto Linux," said Peter Houston, senior director 
at Microsoft's server group, adding that there were no plans to detach or 
re-price its Windows server operating system.
"We have made a bet on Windows, 
and we believe that customers are getting value from the bet we made," said 
Houston, 
"and we're going to continue doing what we've been doing for 
customers."
Linux advocates argue that Linux 
offers better security, flexibility and innovation because its underlying code, 
or blueprint, for programs remains open to evaluation and scrutiny.
Microsoft, which has grown into 
the world's largest software maker by selling proprietary software that cannot 
be copied or modified freely, said it is not opposed to open-source software, 
and points out that its source code is available to approved partners and 
educational institutions on a limited basis.
Cost A Non-Issue
Microsoft faced a similar 
situation a decade ago when its nascent server software was competing 
head-to-head with market leader Sun Microsystems, but Microsoft did not choose 
at the time to write software for Sun's proprietary version of Unix.
Now Linux, essentially a free 
version of Unix, is eating away at Sun's share of the business server 
market.
Sun, a hardware and software 
maker, is now selling computers running Linux, a strategy that was also embraced 
by International Business Machines. 
Redmond, Washington-based 
Microsoft has toned down its criticism of Linux recently, after an internal 
strategy document said that some of its arguments against open source software 
has "backfired."
Instead, Microsoft has stressed 
that its software is more affordable when considering the total cost of using 
Linux, including ongoing personnel and administration costs.
A recent Microsoft-sponsored study 
by researcher IDC concluded that servers based on Microsoft's Windows 2000 were 
cheaper to own and operate when used for networking, storing and sharing files, 
printing and security, while Linux servers were cheaper to operate when used for 
Web hosting.
"The IDC study shows that the 
upfront cost is a small part of the total cost to the customer," said 
Microsoft's Houston.
META Group's report also came to 
the same conclusion, saying that Linux's total costs of ownership were likely to 
be higher for mainstream server applications.
"IT organisations must evaluate 
platform costs from a total-cost-of-ownership perspective," META Group's report 
said.
Source: "Economic Times" dt 10th 
Dec '02
=================================================================
<DIV>N.S. Soundara Rajan, freelance IT journalist and 
Knowledge networker, based at Mysore, 
India</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;...connecting 
people to people, and people to 
knowledge</DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>

--Boundary_(ID_J+x5+DEDxR/uWecXIVaFag)--

--Boundary_(ID_ow6JYy2Vaxb+/XmkrCPW3A)
Content-type: image/gif; name=spacer.gif
Content-transfer-encoding: base64
Content-disposition: attachment; filename=spacer.gif
Content-Location: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/images/spacer.gif

R0lGODlhAQABAID/AMDAwAAAACH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAQAICRAEAOw==

--Boundary_(ID_ow6JYy2Vaxb+/XmkrCPW3A)--